|
Post by St. Louis Wrestling Rocks! on Jan 28, 2009 9:45:28 GMT -5
You haven't seen part two of the year in review show yet then...
|
|
|
Post by Justin Clark on Jan 28, 2009 10:40:34 GMT -5
Okay, because if this thing becomes ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK, I've seriously got no respect for it, and it may as well be as bad as the rest of the other shows that have come and gone.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Wrestling Rocks! on Jan 28, 2009 12:12:53 GMT -5
I'll be sure to hit the breaks if the show starts reminding me of RSC or OTR and say hey, we're going the wrong direction here we need to get back on track.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Clark on Jan 28, 2009 12:20:18 GMT -5
Yeah, but the Nose Bleed Seats were built on the idea of proving what was good about the scene and not even paying attention to the bad. And when the train was on that track, it worked. The entire scene looked better and everyone in it as well. So, to even stray from that line of thinking doesn't bode well. Even watching that first part of the year in review seemed weird to me, because most, if not all, of the stories had some negative connotation to it.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Wrestling Rocks! on Jan 28, 2009 14:04:36 GMT -5
Well for the negative stuff in the year in review show, keep in mind this show was based on the top ten St. Louis wrestling news stories of 2008.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Clark on Jan 28, 2009 14:17:47 GMT -5
Yeah, YOU picked the negative stories to talk about. No one voted on a top ten.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Wrestling Rocks! on Jan 28, 2009 14:47:26 GMT -5
Why should it be put to a vote? Do newspapers publish stories on what the readers want them to print via vote? This list was determined by significance and the level of attention a particular story got.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Clark on Jan 28, 2009 15:15:02 GMT -5
Why should it be put to a vote? Do newspapers publish stories on what the readers want them to print via vote? This list was determined by significance and the level of attention a particular story got. ... in your opinion. You forgot that part. You could tell that the other panelist couldn't care less about some of those topics.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Wrestling Rocks! on Jan 28, 2009 15:22:42 GMT -5
Probably because they haven't heard about these news items before. Seriously, the top ten stories list was put out weeks ago and I've gotten almost zero feedback on it...like why is this story on the list or how is this a bigger story than the other. I had to literally go out and ask people their thoughts on it.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Clark on Jan 28, 2009 15:50:05 GMT -5
If noone cared, then how were they the top stories? Because you wanted them to be. There's a logic that you're missing about all this. Try listening to others about what 'news' is, and stop trying to tell them what you think it is.
|
|
wrestling09
Has an excessive amount of free time on his hands posting nothing but gibberish
Posts: 723,160
|
Post by wrestling09 on Jan 28, 2009 16:05:31 GMT -5
aint that the truth george3
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Wrestling Rocks! on Jan 28, 2009 17:21:54 GMT -5
There's a lot of things the press cover that people don't care about, such as the stuff that gets ramroded through Congress, a ton of things governor has done the past six years before he got arrested, steroid use in baseball, how many payday loan companies are operating along MacArthur Blvd....I particularily don't care about who's winning American Idol or Dancing With the Stars, others don't care about the Super Bowl...so what's your point?
|
|
|
Post by Justin Clark on Jan 28, 2009 17:31:14 GMT -5
If the show were there just to entertain/inform you, you'd be right in your ways. However, it was created to entertain/inform everyone possible. You're topics didn't do that. That's my point.
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Wrestling Rocks! on Jan 28, 2009 17:35:57 GMT -5
It didn't entertain YOU in particular. I didn't know you spoke for everyone.
|
|
|
Post by george3 on Jan 28, 2009 18:12:21 GMT -5
If you had to go out and find feedback that's probably because no one cared about them. If you had put out a poll on the top ten wrestling stories of the year you may have gotten much different results than your choices. Obviously you geared it to your tastes. In all the time you have been doing this you have yet to deduce that your tastes do not speak for the majority of fans.
|
|